MGF & MGTF Model Evolution |
||
The
first all-new MG
MG had stopped producing sports
cars in 1980 when British Leyland
closed
their Abingdon plant, although the badge of MG was used on
badge-engineered hatchbacks and saloons between 1982 and 1991. In 1992,
the company (by this time Rover Group) restarted production of the
classic MGB as the limited edition RV8, and positive reaction led the
company to develop the MGF. The MGF was launched in the
Northern Hemisphere autumn of 1995 by the
Rover
Group, making it the third car to be launched since the takeover by
BMW. It was powered by a 1.8L K-series 16-valve engine, the basic
having 120PS (88 kW) while the more powerful VVC (variable valve
control) had 145PS (107 kW). Although popular across Rover's model
range, when fitted to the MGF the K-series engine was plagued by head
gasket failure, often attributed to the more complex nature of cooling
a mid-engine car. Rover did little to address this, with owners
frequently having to meet the cost of expensive repairs themselves
early in the life of their vehicles. Rover Special Projects oversaw the
development of the F's design and before finalising the styling
bought-in outside contractors to determine the most appropriate
mechanical configuration for the new car. The MGF underwent a facelift
in autumn of 1999, and gave the car a
revised interior as well as styling tweaks and fresh alloy wheels
designs. There was also the introduction of a base 1.6 version and a
more powerful 160PS (118 kW) variant called the Trophy 160, which had
a 0-60 mph time of 6.9 seconds. It was only produced for a limited time. EXF Project EXF represents a
limited production of five single-seat MGF
sports cars that allude to historic land-speed records set by MG
between 1930 and 1959. Known simply as the F, the MG car features
largely standard MGF components, a turbocharged 1.4L (329 PS) Rover
K-series engine, and a drag coefficient of less than 0.25. On 20 August
1997, the F achieved a top speed of 217 mph (349 km/h) at the SpeedWeek
festivities in Bonneville, Utah, United States. MGTF In 2002, the MGTF was released,
named after the MGTF Midget of the
1950s. Based upon the MGF platform, but heavily redesigned and
reengineered, the most significant mechanical changes were the
abandonment of Hydragas suspension in favour of conventional coil
springs, the new design of the air induction system that along with new
camshafts produces more power than in MGF engines, and the torsional
stiffness of the body increased by 20%. The MGTF was assessed with four
star safety performance from Euro NCAP
and ANCAP. In March 2007, Nanjing Automobile
Group, which bought MG Rover's
remaining assets during bankruptcy proceedings, restarted production of
the MGTF at its Nanjing factory, with a capacity of 200.000 cars a
year. Experts from the Longbridge factory were involved in
building the new TFs in Nanjing. Concept CarsXPower 500
Created by the XPower
division of the MG Rover Group in 2001 as a one
off to show the brand new XPower division and also to show what the
engineers could do. The car was designed to accommodate the brand new
XP-20 engine used in the MG-Lola EX257 race car with a Garrett
turbocharger with an anti-lag system which achieves 500PS. The Power
then goes through a 6 Speed sequential gearbox manufactured by X-Trac. MGTF GT ![]() The concept car was developed from a top of the range TF 160, and came with a grenadine interior (a rare option typically in the top of range TF's), brand new lowered bucket seats, 17" OZ five spoke wheels, a front splitter to improve aerodynamics and for the first time in a production/factory TF a 2.5L Rover KV6 engine. It was reported on forums for MG that the engine was changed to a standard 160 VVC 1.8L K-series sometime in 2005, although this is disputed and is also disputed as to whether the car received a KV6 in the first place. When launched the car proposed several problems. The first of the problems with the coupe is engine access which because the car is a mid rear arrangement proposed several problems and made the car hard to work on, it is reported that the subframe had to be removed in order to work on the engine. The second problem is the KV6 powerplant which had to have a bespoke smaller fuel tank to fit in the engine bay as the standard fuel tank wouldn't fit, although disputed as to whether the car received the KV6 powerplant in the first place. Former engineers at MG Rover reported that the car was close to entering production, and as soon as the end of 2005, the car could have been sold. However MG Rover went into receivership, and progress was halted. Nanjing were set to revive the idea and manufacture in the US in a brand new factory in Oklahoma employing 500 people. This idea also never came about with the LE500 and TF135 being the only TF produced by Nanjing at Longbridge, rather than a new purpose built facility in Oklahoma. Reception Throughout its production, the MG sold successfully. In a number of road tests, the MGF impressed, and was a match for its main rivals the Mazda MX-5 and BMW Z3 in terms of handling, performance and practicality, but build quality, reliability and dealer support within the United Kingdom were poor in comparison to its Japanese and German rivals. However, after Nanjiing took over and restarted production, the car's sales plummeted, until production was eventually ceased in March 2011. Parker's gave the car 2.5/5 and said its pros were "Styling, handling and brand heritage" and cons were "Dated interior, patchy build quality and poor reliability". What Car? gave it 2/5 saying its pros were that it is "pretty and affordable" but its cons were "The driving position and steering are not what you'd expect in such a sporty car". Auto Express reviewed it after Nanjiing took over, and also had a verdict of 2/5, liking how it was "well equipped and compact" but disliking how it was priced more expensive than a basic Mazda MX-5, stating it has "barely changed since 1995, and can be mistaken for a much older vehicle" and also commenting on its cramped interior. The engine of K-series used in the MGF has gained a reputation for head gasket failure. This is mainly due to the design and placement of the thermostat, however the installation of the headgasket was also a major factor. Other factors include insufficient width between the cylinders, build tolerances, block face stiffness, casting quality, gasket material, and cooling system layout (the engine is at the back and the radiator is at the front). Due to the placement of the thermostat on the intake side of the water pump at the base of the block the head can overheat before sufficient heat is transmitted through the block to allow the thermostat to open. Thermal shock from cooling the block rapidly and the thermostat closing abruptly due to cold water from the radiator cooling the opening spring can result in insufficient coolant reaching as far as the head, which can cause different expansion and contraction rates between the head and the block. This combined with the early practice of installing the head gasket with plastic locating dowels, which subsequently melted when the engines overheated, allowed the head gaskets to "walk". A redesigned head gasket, which consists of a multiple layer metal gasket or "MLS" used in conjunction with steel locating dowels, is alleged to significantly reduce the chance of a head gasket failure. There is no replacement engine that is a suitable replacement for the motor of K-series. Apart from the head gasket problem, MGF and TF models are said to have few major faults. The engine for the K-series was sourced from the existing Rover line and was mainly intended as a front engined commuter vehicle power source. The design compromise of locating the thermostat on the pump intake rather than the head outlet originates in this original use. A common aftermarket modification by those who intent to drive their MGFs spiritedly is to install an Inline thermostat in the outlet pipe from the head to the radiator. This head gasket problem is also found on K-series engined Lotus Elises and is also commonly solved by thermostat relocation. |